开来我开在Live的space还是真冷清啊，这里也更新一下吧。

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－

纯水贴

Elmo的新MSN号是:

 

现在处于过渡时期双号并用,不久就会正式弃旧从新

大家快加我的新号!!!

昨天去买了个80G的笔记本硬盘，Hitachi，花了￥490，顺便用￥40买个个盒子把原来的硬盘装起来。

这下爽了，回来就把Altera一家们和Matlab装掉。刚刚又等不及下了个Ubuntu，暂时留了10G给它^_^。纵观网上文章和身边实例，装双系统可是一个巨大的冒险。不过这次准备挺而走险，这篇写完之后就准备刻盘装Ubuntu，——不成功就又要重装系统啦！

阿弥陀佛……

一定好考好。否则花了那么多时间亏大了！阿弥陀佛！

万恶的点名啊，又落到我头上了……

小4在新加坡也不放过我！情人节吃好午饭，无聊就回应一下了。

 

 

 

天天都在讨论成绩，时不时顶上个十大……讨分、报分、长吁短叹

无语……

 

纵览思源bbs哪个上面风气是这样的……

寒假了，觉得轻松了好多，当我最担心的一门出了一个令我比较诧异又不太满意的分数之后，觉得压力一下子小了很多。

寒假大家都去实习了，我堕落……家里蹲。不过还是要干点事情，所以先定一个计划。说到计划，从小学定到大学，carry out的寥寥无几——但是有总比没有好，目标取其上得其中嘛。

1、虐了AW

2、和两大牛一起把ALTERA计划写好

3、看五部好电影

4、把思想汇报抄完（说道这个我就火）

bless都能完成

今天，用一场极其失败的DSP考试，惨淡结束了这个学期。考试让我心情非常低落，没学期的最后一门考试总是考得感觉最差的。一方面强弩之末，技术状态一天比一天差，最后没心想复习了；另一方面，放假一天比一天近，心里有按耐不住的冲动，心里状态也就不行了。卷面的话DSP又是一门非常有可能成为大学首挂的课。但是，要知道，经过了一个41个学分的学期，ELMO早已精疲力尽，管他挂不挂，存活下来才是王道。

这学期，尤其是期末的时候，感受到很多冲动。一是，周围牛人众多——进了EE，只有到考试时你才知道什么叫活在牛群之中，自修时一人大乎，XXX课还没看……要挂了——抬头一看是一个拿了两年A奖的家伙……果然过了几天，就听说这家伙又拿了XXX课的98分——巨汗！当然，林子大什么鸟都有，过两天听说了某女生的事迹，让人嗤之以鼻……此事不多说，虽然不认识这个人，但从以貌取人的角度一直对她不太满意，现在又知道了她这种事迹，只能说一句“苏则擦”！当初选择EE，其实最重要的还是想生活在牛人的氛围之中，这样自己会更加充实，但牛人和GPA牛人是有区别的。的确比起其它专业，EE的学习氛围是无法比拟的，但是EEer有时候也太注重分数了，大作业全都是抄的、科创全都是混的、考试前都是通宵的、GPA都吓人的，这不是牛人而是一坨屎。

考通信前，一群人在讨论XYZ又拿了高分，OPQ又考了三位数……一君半天不吭声，最后小声说了一句“分数乃身外之物”，让人感慨……此人上次拿了A奖，考前通宵的一天还看见他在通宵编matlab（没这个考试），近来还听说他还有个什么专利——这个才是牛啊！

本来准备考完试在写space的，不过居然昨天发现海缆好了，那就先写一点。

 

今天庆祝中国试射导弹成功，小胡果然和以往的领导不一样……现在已经猜不透他了，FT的。

 

其它就不说了，希望高频别弄得太丢人……我有不祥的预兆……阿弥陀佛！

 

 

 

 

 

今天问老爸，股票涨了，不是全世界人都赚了嘛！老爸肯定了我的答案，但是我一直认为全世界财富的综合在一个相当小的时间区间里面是一个定值。……难道我的想法错了？

 

老爸对我细心解释，我才明白，其实我的想法并没错。只不过，全世界的人都赚钱里面‘钱’指的是账面价值。这就像做生意，有人赚肯定有人亏，“双赢”是骗人的把戏。当大牛市来的时候，全世界的人是都赚钱了，但是他们的后人就要亏钱。说来很拗口，但我总是觉得这个东西和通信里面的随机过程有千丝万缕的联系。在同一个时间t，会出现各种情况，在同一种情况中，不同的t对应不同的现象。但是假设系统是ergotic的，那么，有人赚肯定有人赔，只不过这两种人不仅仅可能出现在不同的空间，也可能出现在不同的时间。当然了，他们的行为综合在概率上就抵消了。

 

话又说回来，这些东西和我的堕落又有什么关系呢？……你知道吗？

高频我更你拼了！明天拿不下你，就一周不洗澡了！

实在受不了适配器的“惊声尖叫”了！

 Test    Test Date                       Reading    Listening    Speaking    Writing    Total
TELXML  October 22, 2006            28           29            23             28          108

 

口语给我这么低，ETS的猪！

落地尘埃归故土， 花瓣纷飞缈若雾； 有缘三生相追随， 意在伊人终不悔； 流年此去不复返， 水声潺潺诉忧怨； 无奈人生不随梦， 情意绵绵难随风。

刚看了……

虽然事先就知道大部分情节了，但是看了之后还是觉得恶心。

感谢彧哥推荐——他老是把没有看过的片子推荐给我。

推荐给每个挑战心理极限的人……bless~~~~~~

上午刚考完T，现在来发布机经。

不过话说回来，了解我的人都知道，我考完试一般是一点题目都不记得的。所以说是机经其实就是感想。

 

阅读：
他娘的5篇。做到后来觉得心力交瘁，正是人生共愤啊！靠前我就祈祷加试的听力，结果还是上了这趟浑水……
现在想想宏哥的话真的是不无道理，阅读之所以大家都做得差，是因为大家都以为自己这方面很强。而往往轻敌了。套用Alex的话“reading不拿分，总觉得有点亏啊！”
所以以后大家要注意了，扬长避短，先要扬长！

 

听力：
强烈建议大家不要练了，听得时候attentive一点就好了。不过有写文章实在让我气死，一开始说三个特点。然后First, Second, Third，然后我看进度条也走得差不多了。于是就放下笔，抬起头，准备迎接题目了。居然又出来其他的一刚！弄得我措手不及。所以好几道就没听到……

 

口语：
不说了，前两道都是老题目了。后面的题目做得不好。不过听听旁边mm的回答，还是找回一点信心的。

作文：
怎么说呢……题目不难，做得也不怎么样。唯一庆幸的就是写完了。但是大作文感觉有点偏题，听天由命吧！

 

补充：
监考的老师总体比较kind，但是考虑到我在主场中的主场作战，居然多给我一张纸都不肯，mean得可以！（那记录纸居然是粉红色的一刚！ETS玩什么啊！）
考完之后到楼下，从包里拿手机，眼镜掉了出来。骤然！用了2年多从未有闪失的眼镜壳子一分为二。虽然本人历来精通天象。但是这种物象还不会解释……请高人指点！凶兆否？

 

For years, Chinese government always acts like a old eclectic no matter what happens. When American battle jet shot our embassy we 'strongly oppose'. When Japenese ship detect the crude oil amount in east China sea, we  excert official argue. And now, North Korea test nuclear weapon right under our nose, we just reluctantly agree the sanction proposed in UN Security Council and refused to take part in the inspection of ships trading to North Korea!!

No more to say, yes, China has a perfect excuse -- economic development is the primary center. Well, therefore, we shall never be entangled with international political affairs too much. We just sit and watch, waiting something happen. What we can do most the 'strongly oppose'. It's good and short sighted.

China is too soft; I hate to say so but it's truth. Looking at those leaders of center government, they strive for building a harmonious society, i.e. they want everyone happy with thier life. However, if a person cannot feel the strength of whose motherland, if a man is abashed to declare he is a Chinese, how can people happy living in this nation.

Patriotism is losing because our nation acts too softly internationally, avoiding taking any responsibility and any risk. What is the most unfortunate is that this is not the worst.

You know what the worst is? China's reluctance to proceed the duty of inspection force the UN and US turn to other to take this job. In the Asia-Pacific region, who will be this lucky dog? Nobody but that rich, ambitious Japan who has been anxiously seeking an opportunity to gain political importance after its post-war economic recovery.

Japan failed to be a member of permanent trustee of UN security council and now the uncomprehendably good-willing China sends a big cake, free of charge.

Chinese government, you try your best to avoid risk and to enhance economic sector. Nevertheless, you're taking a unprecedented risky job, not knowing!

WASHINGTON, Monday, Oct. 9 — North Korea said Sunday night that it had set off its first nuclear test, becoming the eighth country in history, and arguably the most unstable and most dangerous, to proclaim that it has joined the club of nuclear weapons states.

The test came just two days after the country was warned by the United Nations Security Council that the action could lead to severe consequences.

American officials cautioned that they had not yet received any confirmation that the test had occurred. The United States Geological Survey said it had detected a tremor of 4.2 magnitude on the Korean Peninsula.

China called the test a “flagrant and brazen” violation of international opinion and said it “firmly opposes” North Korea’s conduct.

Senior Bush administration officials said that they had little reason to doubt the announcement, and warned that the test would usher in a new era of confrontation with the isolated and unpredictable country run by President Kim Jong-il.

Early Monday morning, even before the test was confirmed, Bush administration officials were holding conference calls to discuss ways to further cut off a country that is already subject to sanctions, and hard-liners said the moment had arrived for neighboring countries, especially China and Russia, to cut off the trade and oil supplies that have been Mr. Kim’s lifeline.

In South Korea, the country that fought a bloody war with the North for three years and has lived with an uneasy truce and failed efforts at reconciliation for more than half a century, officials said they believed that an explosion occurred around 10:36 p.m. New York time — 11:36 a.m. Monday in Korea.

They identified the source of the explosion as North Hamgyong Province, roughly the area where American spy satellites have been focused for several years on a variety of suspected underground test sites.

That was less than an hour after North Korean officials had called their counterparts in China and warned them that a test was just minutes away. The Chinese, who have been North Korea’s main ally for 60 years but have grown increasingly frustrated by the its defiance of Beijing, sent an emergency alert to Washington through the United States Embassy in Beijing. Within minutes, President Bush was notified, shortly after 10 p.m., by his national security adviser, Stephen Hadley, that a test was imminent.

North Korea’s decision to conduct the test demonstrated what the world has suspected for years: the country has joined India, Pakistan and Israel as one of the world’s “undeclared” nuclear powers. India and Pakistan conducted tests in 1998; Israel has never acknowledged conducting a test or possessing a weapon. But by actually setting off a weapon, if that is proven, the North has chosen to end years of carefully crafted and diplomatically useful ambiguity about its abilities.

The North’s decision to set off a nuclear device could profoundly change the politics of Asia.

The test occurred only a week after Japan installed a new, more nationalistic prime minister, Shinzo Abe, and just as the country was renewing a debate about whether its ban on possessing nuclear weapons — deeply felt in a country that saw two of its cities incinerated in 1945 — still makes strategic sense.

And it shook the peninsula just as Mr. Abe was arriving in South Korea for the first time as prime minister, in an effort to repair a badly strained relationship, having just visited with Chinese leaders in Beijing. It places his untested administration in the midst of one of the region’s biggest security crises in years, and one whose outcome will be watched closely in Iran and other states suspected of attempting to follow the path that North Korea has taken.

Now, Tokyo and Washington are expected to put even more pressure on the South Korean government to terminate its “sunshine policy” of trade, tourism and openings to the North — a policy that has been the source of enormous tension between Seoul and Washington since Mr. Bush took office.

The explosion was the product of nearly four decades of work by North Korea, one of the world’s poorest and most isolated countries. The nation of 23 million people appears constantly fearful that its far richer, more powerful neighbors — and particularly the United States — will try to unseat its leadership. The country’s founder, Kim Il-sung, who died in 1994, emerged from the Korean War determined to equal the power of the United States, and acutely aware that Gen. Douglas MacArthur had requested nuclear weapons to use against his country.

But it took decades to put together the technology, and only in the past few years has the North appeared to have made a political decision to speed forward. “I think they just had their military plan to demonstrate that no one could mess with them, and they weren’t going to be deterred, not even by the Chinese,” a senior American official who deals with the North said late Sunday evening. “In the end, there was just no stopping them.”

But the explosion was also the product of more than two decades of diplomatic failure, spread over at least three presidencies. American spy satellites saw the North building a good-size nuclear reactor in the early 1980’s, and by the early 1990’s the C.I.A. estimated that the country could have one or two nuclear weapons. But a series of diplomatic efforts to “freeze” the nuclear program — including a 1994 accord signed with the Clinton administration — ultimately broke down, amid distrust and recriminations on both sides.

Three years ago, just as President Bush was sending American troops toward Iraq, the North threw out the few remaining weapons inspectors living at their nuclear complex in Yongbyon, and moved 8,000 nuclear fuel rods they had kept under lock and key. Those rods contained enough plutonium, experts said, to produce five or six nuclear weapons, though it is unclear how many the North now stockpiles.

For years, some diplomats assumed that the North was using that ambiguity to trade away its nuclear capability, for recognition, security guarantees, aid and trade with the West. But in the end, the country’s reclusive leader, Kim Jong-il, who inherited the mantle of leadership from his father, still called the “Great Leader,” appears to have concluded that the surest way of getting what he seeks is to demonstrate that he has the capability to strike back if attacked.

Assessing the nature of that ability is difficult. If the test occurred as the North claimed, it is unclear whether it was an actual bomb or a more primitive device. Some experts cautioned that it could try to fake an explosion, setting off conventional explosives; the only way to know for sure will be if American “sniffer” planes, patrolling the North Korean coast, pick up evidence of nuclear byproducts in the air.

Even then, it is not clear that the North could fabricate that bomb into a weapon that could fit atop its missiles, one of the country’s few significant exports.

But the big fear about North Korea, American officials have long said, has less to do with its ability to lash out than it does with its proclivity to proliferate. The country has sold its missiles and other weapons to Iran, Syria and Pakistan; at various moments in the six-party talks that have gone on for the past few years, North Korean representatives have threatened to sell nuclear weapons. But in a statement issued last week, announcing that it intends to set off a test, the country said it would not sell its nuclear products.

The fear of proliferation prompted President Bush to declare in 2003 that the United States would never “tolerate” a nuclear-armed North Korea. He has never defined what he means by “tolerate,” and on Sunday night Tony Snow, Mr. Bush’s press secretary, said that, assuming the report of the test is accurate, the United States would now go to the United Nations to determine “what our next steps should be in response to this very serious step.”

Nuclear testing is often considered a necessary step to proving a weapon’s reliability as well as the most forceful way for a nation to declare its status as a nuclear power.

“Once they do that, it’s serious," said Harold M. Agnew, a former director of the Los Alamos weapons laboratory, which designed most of the nation’s nuclear arms. "Otherwise, the North Koreans are just jerking us around.”

Networks of seismometers that detect faint trembles in the earth and track distant rumbles are the best way to spot an underground nuclear test.

The big challenge is to distinguish the signatures of earthquakes from those of nuclear blasts. Typically, the shock waves from nuclear explosions begin with a sharp spike as earth and rock are compressed violently. The signal then tends to become fuzzier as surface rumblings and shudders and after shocks create seismologic mayhem.

With earthquakes, it is usually the opposite. A gentle jostling suddenly becomes much bigger and more violent.

Most of the world’s seismic networks that look for nuclear blasts are designed to detect explosions as small as one kiloton, or equal to 1,000 tons of high explosives. On instruments for detecting earthquakes, such a blast would measure a magnitude of about 4, like a small tremor.

Philip E. Coyle III, a former head of weapons testing at the Pentagon and former director of nuclear testing for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, a weapons-design center in California, said the North Koreans could learn much from a nuclear test even if it was small by world standards or less than an unqualified success.

“It would not be totally surprising if it was a fizzle and they said it was a success because they learned something,” he said. “We did that sometimes. We had a missile defense test not so long ago that failed, but the Pentagon said it was a success because they learned something, which I agree with. Failures can teach you a lot.”